David Caspar Friedrichs painting “Wanderer above a sea of Ice” (1818) is the inspiration for this assessment. I like the relationships shown in the painting me with the landscape, me with the person and the person with landscape all in one scene.

I wanted to show the reaction people have when they see the landscape in Antarctica not all will get to see this wonderful place. So I think it is important to show this reaction so people may comprehend how special this place is.

This critique is in two parts one part working in the field and then creating the method to present it as a finished piece of work.

The fieldwork went well I knew how to set myself up to get the perspective I wanted to show the subject in the landscape. I had to work fast as I wanted to show a reaction that lasted a fraction of a moment. This meant I missed some shots and so had to take many to get these 12 exposures that make the book.  The work sits well together as a series and in my opinion shows what I set out to show the way the scenery effects people who see it. I captured the three way relationship shown in Friedrichs painting.

The second part of the critique is of the book itself. Here I had to learn a new skill Japanese Stab Binding was suggested by my tutor. I enjoyed the process of making this book immensely. The finished piece of work is extremely professional and shows the work very well. I was pleased I took the time to make a window for the cover but I could have improved it if I had shown Friedrichs painting in the format he meant it to be shown.

I believe this is the best piece of work I have created within this course.

Work Cited

David Caspar, Friedrich. Wanderer above a Sea of Fog. 1818. Oil on Canvas. Kunst Museum.

This piece of work was always going to be the biggest challenge for me. I haven’t written any kind of essay since leaving college in 1979. My tutor advised me to pick a topic with a small focus so I chose one photograph taken by Dorothea Lange entitled “Towards Los Angeles”.

I completed research into the photo and Dorothea Lange which led to Roy Stryker and the FSA. The research was primarily into the photograph.

When I got the initial feedback from my first effort and my tutor said I had produced a good blog post I felt deflated and went to read my post again. After doing so I agreed with my tutor and felt disappointed in my self. I revisited the work following the annotations my tutor had sent to me. On re-reading this I still felt I could do better. So I stayed up all night reading how to write an academic piece of work.

Also I realised I had to do more research into the background of the photo and also Roy Stryker. This research gave me the data to write an essay and the work I did reading the website of the “Royal Literary Fund” (2020) meant I could start again. My tutor was great going the extra mile allowing me to resubmit and re-reading and re-assessing this work.

In the first piece I wrote, the vocabulary was sloppy, not academic at all, in fact bloglike. Also I had only focussed on the photograph I needed to expand the work to look at the whole picture. The second piece was much better and although I realise I need to carry on the improvement I am happy with this second piece of work.

In previous course I had referenced the work I had read and was surprised to be told I had been doing it wrong. I read “Cite them right” (2005), a book by Pears and Shield which corrected my referencing to the Harvard method of reference.

I feel in the end I created a good piece of writing about a great photograph and its context. However more importantly I realised my inadequacies and have started the journey to putting things right. However I realise there are many more miles to put in to keep the improvement moving forward.

Work Cited

        Fidgety Lizard. “Royal Literary Fund.” Accademic. Royal Literary Fund, 2020. https://www.rlf.org.uk/resources/academic-writing/.

        Pears, Richard, and Graham Shields. Cite Them Right. 6th ed. Pear Tree Books, 2005.

Considering assignment 3 A space that becomes a place work I made earlier this year has to begin by discussing how it came about. I had attended a lecture about seascapes and had listened to a description of Peter Breugel the elders “Landscape with the fall of Icarus”.

As I started make images I wanted to make the point Breugel had in regard to mans folly, both technologically and politically. I thought the Poem written by William Carlos (1962) would be an appropriate accompaniment. Near completion of the work a Chilean Navy C130 aircraft crashed ten miles in front of our vessel taking 38 maintenance engineers and crew with it. This changed the whole context of my work instantly.

I fought with the ethical position of the work but decided it was fitting to carry on after all we think we have over come nature every time we fly in an aircraft. So I continued.

My camera was set with a quick shutter speed to freeze the water and the Albatross, even the snow would add to the image. To get the correct image I chose a bird and followed it panning with it until it was in position in regard to a wave. The project is made of 12 images accompanied by the words of the poem. I feel the work shows exactly what I set out to capture, in fact what happened strengthens the purpose.

The images are strong and clear showing the different aspects of the sea. I like the varied colour and the varied moods of the ocean. The bird adds a second element with its fragility in before the elements.

I could have captured a bird on the water to finish the project but wasn’t lucky enough to see this so could not capture this. I am pleased I resisted using a zoom to get detail the wider images show space and hint at the precarious nature of these birds and this place.

In Breugel`s painting he clearly shows the indifference of man to the suffering of others. This tragedy in the frigid water was all but ignored by the worlds press. It took me hours to find any information when I got back home. So these souls and their plight were ignored just like Icarus.

Overall I am pleased with this project and how it was constructed I dedicate it to the lost people from the aircraft.

Breugel, Peter. Landscape with the Fall of Icarus. 1560. Oil on Wood, 73.5 by 112 centimetres. Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.

 Carlos, William. Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, 1962.